DAL/NE

Accept, give up a high pick next year but Waddle worth it

approve

Based on the recent trades involving stud receivers (Adams, Watson, Evans, and Aiyuk) the absolute floor for a deal like this should be a 1st and 2nd. Waddle is objectively more valuable than all of those players given his track record, inexpensive deal, five year contract, and age. A single dart throw first that likely projects in the late teens/early 20s (in addition to taking back a bad contract) is not anywhere close to fair value.

2-2

This is tough. If I were trading Jaylen Waddle, I’d want more than a future first plus throw-in chips. That being said, I’ve been told this proposal was made by the team losing Waddle, and that changes my perception a bit.

Approve, and sorry to LAC but I hope that pick ends up high enough to validate this move.

4-2

Veto, 4-4, a bad contract, a future first (at best a top 15ish pick) and a 4th for Waddle. Waddle should command a 1st and 2nd this year or an entire future draft class (25 or 26).